On this page
The short answer
ni hao cat ($mihao) was not launched with a block of wallets that kept the supply. Its launch block was the creator's own buy and a bot that left within seconds. What bundle trackers pick up is the creator handing out 7.04% of the supply to 22 wallets for free in the coin's first days. The coin then sat near a few hundred thousand dollars for two weeks, began to run on the evening of November 10, and was already four times higher when Ansem posted its contract. A wallet tied to him had bought 69 minutes earlier. The full board of this investigation, with every wallet and transaction, is on Anceta Investigations.
The investigation, live
This report was built in Anceta Investigations, our new tool for following coins and wallets on Solana: each card below is a step that read the chain, every note links its transaction, and each chapter is one part of the story. The board is live: move around it, open a card to see everything it read, or turn the chapters with the bar at the bottom.
Pro members can open their own cases with the same tools. See every public investigation.
Was the launch bundled?
The creator, 9tH2zR…, made the coin on pump.fun at 13:27:41 UTC on October 25, 2026, and bought 15.38% of the supply in the same transaction for 5.113 SOL (the creation). In the very next block, the same second, a wallet called 6Qq8RhAH… bought 11.36% for 5.165 SOL. It is a trading bot: more than 20,000 transactions, first funded on October 20 by another wallet, and nothing on the chain ties it to the creator. It sold every coin at 13:27:51, ten seconds after buying, for 4.829 SOL (the sale).
- the creator, 15.38%
- a bot, next block, 11.36%, sold in 10 s
- everyone else
Source: Anceta, read from Solana. All times UTC.
No other wallet bought in the launch blocks. In the first hour, 146 wallets traded on the launch curve; the five biggest buyers, each taking 4.5% to 7.6%, sold most or all of it within the hour. Six wallets still held between 1.7% and 2.5% each an hour after launch, one of them a wallet the creator had also sent coins to. So no group of wallets took a block of the supply in the launch blocks and kept it; what stayed was spread over wallets that bought in the open in the following minutes.
What the creator did with its coins
Nine minutes after launch the creator began sending coins away: 10 wallets got about 0.5% each within 16 minutes, and by November 10 it had sent 7.04% to 22 wallets in 22 plain transfers (7.03% of it by October 31), with no SOL coming back (the first one). This is the pattern bundle trackers flag. On the chain, 20 of the 22 wallets were first funded by someone other than the creator, most of them months or years before, and they share no funder with each other; 2 were funded by the creator, both in 2024. Who controls them is not something the chain shows. Together they hold 0.74% today.
The creator itself has never sold a coin for SOL. At 05:02:04 UTC on November 11 it moved 5.43% of the supply into a Streamflow contract, a program for locks and vesting (the transfer); that account is now the largest holder. We did not decode its release schedule. The creator's wallet keeps 3.00%.
The night it ran
For two weeks the coin traded quietly at about $0.2M, and on November 9 at about $0.44M. On the afternoon of November 10 it started to climb: about $0.8M at 15:00 UTC and $1.4M by 17:00. At 22:17:38 the wallet tied to Ansem bought. A minute later, from 22:18, bots flooded the main pool, at times with more than 200 transactions a second and many of them failing, and the price jumped.
Source: Anceta, read from Solana. All times UTC.
By 23:25, a minute before Ansem's first post with the contract, the market value was $6.00M, four times what it was at 22:10. In the four minutes before the post, two wallets bought 10,000 and 7,236 USDC of it (23:22:14 and 23:24:53 UTC); neither has any transfer with Ansem's wallet. Coins named after it had also started to appear in numbers at about 23:15. Then came the post, “vibe shift”, with the contract, at 23:26:47. Within a minute the coin was at about $8M, at midnight $14.5M. He posted it again at 00:17 and 01:13, and twice more at 12:14 and 12:21 UTC on November 11.
The pool stayed in a storm for hours: between 00:30 and 01:31 UTC, 1,390,884 transactions named the main pool, about 23,000 a minute, 31% of them failing.
Ansem's wallet
The wallet GV6UUm… is publicly tied to Ansem: it is the wallet behind the pump.fun profile ansemconzimp, labelled as his by Arkham. It signed three buys of ni hao cat, each paid in USDC:
- Nov 10 22:17:3815,000.29 USDC
- Nov 11 05:33:0825,000.14 USDC
- Nov 11 05:39:5510,000.15 USDC
Source: Anceta, read from Solana. All times UTC.
Show the numbersHide the numbers
| Time (UTC) | Paid | Coins | Market value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11-10 22:17:38 | 15,000.29 USDC | 7,479,641 | $2.01M |
| 11-11 05:33:08 | 25,000.14 USDC | 1,492,457 | $16.8M |
| 11-11 05:39:55 | 10,000.15 USDC | 552,015 | $18.1M |
In all it paid 50,000.58 USDC for 9,524,113 coins, and 383,045 more came in through more than 170 small transfers from other wallets. When we read it, it held 9,907,158 coins, 0.99% of the supply, and had sold none. The first buy came 69 minutes before the first post with the contract that we hold from his account.
Is he buying through other wallets?
We checked three ways. In his wallet's latest 12,000 transactions, back to November 2, it sent money to one other wallet (250,350 USDC), and that wallet holds no $mihao. We took the six large holders who bought before his first post and read their histories: none ever sent or received SOL, USDC or the coin to or from his wallet. Two of them used the same fee payer as his buys, but that address pays for about a thousand transactions every five minutes for many users of a trading service, so it is not a link. We found nothing that shows other wallets buying for him. A wallet funded through an exchange would not show up in this check.
Who holds it now
When we read every account at about 16:15 UTC on November 11, 24,187 wallets held the coin. The count rose from 3,661 at 23:06 on November 10 to 12,646 at 00:37, an hour and a half. Many are small: 6,565 wallets hold less than $1 of it, and 6,182 hold $1 to $10. The top 10 hold 20.4%: the Streamflow lock (5.43%), the creator (3.00%), the main pool, the wallet tied to Ansem (0.99%), and wallets that bought on November 10 and 11. Among the 40 biggest holders whose first funder we could read, none shared a funder.
What to weigh at $15M and above
The coin's market value was about $24.9M when we read it, and its main pool held 2,919 SOL against 10,978,793 coins: liquidity of about $0.52M, about 2% of the market value. That is thin for its size.
Source: Anceta, read from Solana. All times UTC.
Three holders alone could each move it that far: the creator's 3.00% (plus 5.43% locked on terms we did not read), the wallet tied to Ansem with 0.99%, and the largest buyers of November 10. The trading is crowded with bots, the holder count is padded with dust, and 1,249 coins took its name in a day. None of this says what the coin will do: it says how much of the price rests on a few wallets and a thin pool.
The rest of the day on Solana
From 15:00 UTC on November 10 to 15:00 UTC on November 11, Anceta recorded 40,900 new coins: 35,642 on pump.fun, 1,642 on Meteora's launchpads, 2,657 created straight on a pool. Our reader was off from 05:29 to 10:43 UTC, so coins launched then are missing and the totals are low. Of the 16,554 pump.fun coins that found buyers, 32.4% had rugged by the close, half of them within 16.3 minutes; 513 left their launch curve. Coins made straight on a PumpSwap pool, with no launchpad, carried 58% of the $692M traded. 251 wallets launched 46% of all coins.
Source: Anceta, read from Solana. All times UTC.
1,249 coins took its name, from 765 wallets; 145 had rugged by the close. Ansem's words made coins too:
vibeshiftCreated at 23:35:49 UTC, linking a post made in the same second; named after the words of Ansem's first post, nine minutes earlier. $792k traded in 17,620 trades, up to 2,069 wallets in an hour, still trading at the close.
The Tired MonkeyCreated at 03:40:47 UTC, linking a post made 13 seconds before the coin. $478k traded in 14,638 trades, up to 1,712 wallets in an hour, still trading at the close.
fine shyt catCreated at 01:39:23 UTC, linking a post from 23:16 UTC the night before. $244k traded in 6,080 trades, up to 743 wallets in an hour, still trading at the close.
All three came from a creator wallet with no earlier coin, the creator held none of it, the wallets of the launch block had left, and the average trade was $33 to $45: the profile of a real crowd.
Questions people ask
Was ni hao cat ($mihao) bundled at launch?
Not in the sense of a group of wallets holding a block of the supply. In the launch block the creator bought 15.38% of the supply. In the next block a trading bot with 20,000+ transactions bought 11.36% and sold all of it ten seconds later. The creator then sent 7.04% of the supply to 22 wallets as plain transfers, 10 of them within 16 minutes; 20 of those 22 were first funded by someone other than the creator. Those transfers are what bundle trackers often flag.
Did Ansem buy ni hao cat before he posted it?
A wallet publicly tied to Ansem (GV6UUm…, the wallet behind the pump.fun profile ansemconzimp) signed a swap of 15,000.29 USDC for 7,479,641 $mihao at 22:17:38 UTC on November 10, 69 minutes before the first post with the contract that we hold from his account (23:26:47 UTC). It bought twice more the next morning, 50,001 USDC in all, and had sold none when we read it.
Is Ansem using other wallets to buy ni hao cat?
We found nothing that shows it. In his wallet's latest 12,000 transactions, back to November 2, it sent money to one other wallet, which holds no $mihao, and none of the six large holders that bought before his first post ever exchanged SOL, USDC or the coin with his wallet. A wallet funded through an exchange would not show up in this check.
Who holds the most ni hao cat?
The top 10 holders had 20.4% of the supply when we read it. The largest is a Streamflow lock holding about 5.4%, sent there by the creator; then the creator's wallet (3.00%), the main pool, and the wallet tied to Ansem (0.99%).
How we read it
The coin. Every transaction of the creator's token account and of the launch curve, read from Solana on November 11, 2026; the holders from every token account of the coin at about 16:15 UTC; the value bands at $0.0233 a coin.
The night. The main pool (Ho1aSG6W…) every two minutes from 21:00 to 01:30 UTC: the pool's own reserves after a swap give the price; SOL in dollars from CoinGecko for that minute. Transaction counts are every transaction naming the pool, failed ones included.
Ansem. The posts are those from his own account that name the coin's address, read from X. The wallet is the one Anceta's registry ties to him, with its source. A buy is a swap the wallet signed. The multi-wallet check covers the wallets it paid in its latest 12,000 transactions (back to 18:20 UTC on November 2) and the six largest holders that bought before 23:26:47; it cannot see wallets funded through an exchange.
The day. 15:00 UTC November 10 to 15:00 UTC November 11, with the reader off 05:29–10:43 UTC. Rugged: Anceta's rule (what counts as rugged).
Sources
- 1.The investigation board, every wallet and transaction. Anceta Investigations
- 2.Ansem on X, the first post with the contract. November 10, 2026, 23:26:47 UTC
- 3.The creation and the creator's buy. October 25, 2026, 13:27:41 UTC
- 4.The first buy signed by the wallet tied to Ansem. November 10, 2026, 22:17:38 UTC
- 5.The creator's transfer to Streamflow. November 11, 2026, 05:02:04 UTC
- 6.Who is Ansem, and the wallet tied to him. Datawallet
Related research
- 1.Ansem and Sahil Arora: we followed the 129.5 SOL receipt. the wallet tied to Ansem, and pump.fun's payouts to it
- 2.Solana memecoins, the last 24 hours: November 10, 2026. the day before
Pattern analysis, not financial advice. Similar coins can behave differently.
